BUSN 420 All Assignments

$41.00

BUSN 420 All Assignments
Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion…

 

Description

BUSN 420 All Assignments

BUSN 420 All Assignments

A+ Week 1-7

Assignment Week 1 

Case 4.2: Supremacy Clause

Case 4.7: Equal Protection Clause

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-1/

 Prepare answers to the following chapter-end Critical Legal Thinking Cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from this week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question, you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double-spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

The case of Manufacturers Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District involves the Clean Air Act, which implements national air pollution standards for fleet vehicles, such as trucks, taxicabs, and buses.  In the same manner, the South Coast Air Quality Management District implements its own pollution standards for Los Angele, California.  A political entity of California, South Coast implements fleet rules that…

In the case of Metropolitan Life Insurance Co v Ward, commissioner of Insurance of Alabama, the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co filed a case against the state of Alabama for imposing unfair laws on out-of-state insurance companies in comparison to domestic insurance companies.  In particular, the state imposed a…

Assignment Week 2 

Case 5.2: Negligence

Case 6.1: Strict Liability

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-2/

Prepare answers to the following chapter-end Critical Legal Thinking Cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question, you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double-spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of Wilhem v. Flores, Wilhelm owned beehives, which he kept in his own property.  Black ran a honeybee business and was a customer of Wilhem.  Flores was employed by Black to assist him in picking up the beehives from Wilhelm.  Although Black provided Flores with a protective suit for him to wear while picking up the bees, neither he nor Wilhelm advised Flores of how dangerous it was to work with bees.  As it turned out, Flores would…

In the case of Lakin v. Senco, Lakin purchased an SN325 nail gun, which was manufactured by Senco.  Senco made a new model of the nail gun, which was capable of shooting longer nails.  However, this new nail gun model did not undergo thorough testing, as Senco did not want to lose its…

Assignment Week 3 

Case 9.2: Bilateral or Unilateral Contract

Case 10.2: Agreement

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-3/

Prepare answers to the following chapter-end Critical Legal Thinking Cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double-spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of Bickham v. Washington Bank & Trust Company, Bruce Bickham and G.S. Adams, Jr. made an agreement that Bickham would do his corporate and personal banking with the bank in exchange of which the bank would loan money to Bickham at an interest rate of 7.5%.  The loan Bickham made was payable in 10 years, and for the next two years, the bank granted Bickham loans at an interest rate of 7.5%.  However, Adams resigned from the…

In the case of McLaughlin v Heikkila, Wilbert Heikkila listed eight parcels f real estate property for sale.  In response, David McLaughlin sent three written offers for the three parcels of land.  The offers came with purchase agreements and three earnest-money checks.  However, Heikkila changed the terms of the purchase requirements, and before McLaughlin signed the purchase agreements to accept the…

BUSN 420 All Assignments

Assignment Week 4 

Case 13.5: Innocent Misrepresentation

Case 20.1: Cure

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-4/

Prepare answers to the following chapter-end Critical Legal Thinking Cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double-spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of Yost v. Rieve Enterprises, Inc., W.G. Yost sold his restaurant, the Red Barn’s, equipment and assets to Evelyn Ramano on  behalf of Rieve Enterprises, Inc.  The contract also included a five-year lease of the land and building, with an option to buy them. Although the restaurant has been cited for some health violations previously, Yost assured Ramano that the…

In the case of Joc Oil USA, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Joc Oil entered into a contract with an Italian oil refinery for the purchase of low-sulfur fuel oil.  The Italian refinery provided Joc Oil with a certificate, which indicated that the oil’s sulfur content…

BUSN 420 All Assignments

Assignment Week 5 

Case 16.1: Specific Performance

Case 18.7: Goods or Service

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-5/

Prepare answers to the following chapter-end Critical Legal Thinking Cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question, you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of California and Hawaiian Sugar Company v. Sun Ship, Inc., the California and Hawaiian Sugar Company (C&H) contracted Sun Ship, Inc. (Sun Ship) to build them a vessel at the price of $25, 405,000.  C&H also gave Sun Ship 1 and ¾ years to build the ship and deliver it to them.  In addition, the contract contained a liquidated damage clause that required a payment of $17,000 per day for every day that the delivery of the…

In the case of Hector vs. Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Frances Hector underwent a heart surgery at Cedars-Sinai medical Center.  A pacemaker was installed in her heart by Dr. Eugene Kompaniez. However, the pacemaker, manufactured by American Technology, was…

BUSN 420 All Assignments

Assignment Week 6 

Case 7.3: Dilution of a Trade Mark

Case 23.7: Holder in Due Course

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-6/

Prepare answers to the following cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus). Each answer should be double spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Review:

In the case of V Secret Catalogue, Inc. and Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc. v. Moseley, Victoria’s Secret–a successful international retailer of women’s beauty, clothing, and lingerie products–filed a case against Victor and Cathy Moseley for using the name Victor’s Little Secret and Victor’s Secret for its store, which sells racy…

In the case of Federal Credit Union v. Royal Insurance, Royal Insurance Company issued a draft amounting to $2,000, payable through the Morgan Trust Company. In particular, the draft was made payable to Gary E. Terrell as part of the settlement to his claim in an insurance policy for the damage caused by a fire in the  premises in Kansas City, Missouri. However,…

BUSN 420 All Assignments

Assignment Week 7 

Case 29.1: Agency

Case 37.1: Piercing the Corporate Veil

https://www.hiqualitytutorials.com/product/busn420-assignment-week-7/

Prepare answers to the following cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question, you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus. Each answer should be double spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of Ginn v Renaldo, Inc, the plaintiff Ginn was silly drunk at a nightclub owned by Renaldo, Inc.  As a result, the nightclub manager, along with some patrons, asked Ginn to leave the premises.  The police was also called.  However, upon…

In the case of Geringer v. Wildhorn Ranch, Inc., the family of two guests who drowned at the Wildhorn Ranch Resort sued the company for damages. M. R. Watters was the majority shareholder of Wildhorn among other businesses.  He ran these businesses from his home in Rocky Ford, Colorado, and…

BUSN 420 All Assignments

DeVry