BUSN420 Assignment Week 7

$17.50

BUSN420 Assignment Week 7
Case 29.1: Agency and Case 37.1: Piercing the Corporate Veil 

SKU: BUSN420 Assignment Week 7 Categories: , , Tags: , , , ,

Description

BUSN420 Assignment Week 7

BUSN420 Assignment Week 7

A+

Case 29.1: Agency 

Case 37.1: Piercing the Corporate Veil 

Prepare answers to the following cases from this week’s reading.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical, and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice.

For full credit, you need to use the material from the week’s lectures, text, and/or discussions when responding to the questions. It is important that you incorporate the question into your response (i.e., restate the question in your introduction) and explain the legal principle(s) or concept(s) from the text that underlies your judgment.

For each question, you should provide at least one reference in APA format (in-text citations and references as described in detail in the Syllabus. Each answer should be double spaced in 12-point font, and your response to each question should be between 300 and 1,000 words in length.

Submit this assignment as a single Word document covering both cases.

Preview:

In the case of Ginn v Renaldo, Inc, the plaintiff Ginn was silly drunk at a nightclub owned by Renaldo, Inc.  As a result, the nightclub manager, along with some patrons, asked Ginn to leave the premises.  The police was also called.  However, upon…

In the case of Geringer v. Wildhorn Ranch, Inc., the family of two guests who drowned at the Wildhorn Ranch Resort sued the company for damages. M. R. Watters was the majority shareholder of Wildhorn among other businesses.  He ran these businesses from his home in Rocky Ford, Colorado, and…