MGMT520 Miller v McCalla

$16.50

MGMT520 Miller v McCalla
Miller (plaintiff) sued McCalla (defendant) for violation of the FDCPA (Act) for failing to state…

 

Description

MGMT520 Miller v McCalla

MGMT520 Miller v McCalla

MGMT 520 A+ PowerPoint Presentation – Speaker Notes Included

CASE 25-6 Miller v. McCalla, Raymer Padrick and Clark, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 214 F.3d 872 (2000)

Miller (plaintiff) sued McCalla (defendant) for violation of the FDCPA (Act) for failing to state “the amount of the debt” in a dunning letter that the defendant sent. The plaintiff argued that the relevant time for determining debt is when it first arises, not when collection begins. The defendants replied that they did state the amount of the debt.

The lower court granted summary judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff appealed…